Release week 2023-12-20
⭐ This week's notable releases
1 novel sequence, 3 confidently wrong. Highlight: Human Consensus Olfactory Receptor OR52c in apo .
| PDB | Protein | Flags | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8W77_A ↗ | Human Consensus Olfactory Receptor OR52c in apo | confidently wrong | A close pre-cutoff homolog existed yet AlphaFold confidently missed the fold. |
|
|
Scavenger receptor class F member 1 | novel · 74% | Genuinely unseen sequence (26% identity to anything AlphaFold trained on). |
|
|
Melanoma-associated antigen 4 peptide | confidently wrong | A close pre-cutoff homolog existed yet AlphaFold confidently missed the fold. |
|
|
Olfactory receptor OR52c,Soluble cytochrome b562 | confidently wrong | A close pre-cutoff homolog existed (46% identity to 5UIG_1) yet AlphaFold confidently missed the fold. |
Zoomed into the red "confidently wrong" box above (pLDDT ≥ 70, TM < 0.5) — the structures AlphaFold got confidently wrong.
The worst offenders ranked, one row per protein (AlphaFold has one model per sequence, so repeat depositions are collapsed — “×N” marks how many structures of that protein exist; the worst is shown). Each row joins what AlphaFold claimed (blue, pLDDT/100) to what the experiment showed (red, TM-score) — the longer the bar, the bigger the miss. Hover a dot to preview its Cα-deviation ribbon; click to open the full entry.
How to read this
Every point is one experimental protein structure. The horizontal axis is AlphaFold's own confidence in its prediction (mean pLDDT, 0–100). The vertical axis is how well that blind prediction actually matches the experiment (TM-score, 0–1; above 0.5 means the same fold, above 0.9 near-identical). Marker size grows with the FRAUD score (confidence-weighted error).
Cutoff: the shaded red box is the "confidently wrong" zone — AlphaFold was confident (mean pLDDT above 70) yet the fold is wrong (TM-score below 0.5). A predictor that had truly solved folding would leave that box empty.
Take-home: 3 of 125 structures (2.4%) are confidently wrong; median TM-score is 0.964.
Read moreShow less — how each metric is calculated
TM-score: how similar the two 3D shapes are overall, 0–1 (a random pair scores ~0.17, an identical fold ~1). Length-normalised so large and small proteins compare fairly. TM = (1/L) Σᵢ 1/(1 + (dᵢ/d₀)²) — dᵢ is the gap between the i-th aligned Cα atoms after best-fit superposition, and d₀ = 1.24(L−15)^⅓ − 1.8 sets the distance scale for length L. Ref: Zhang & Skolnick, Proteins 2004 doi:10.1002/prot.20264; computed with TM-align, doi:10.1093/nar/gki524.
pLDDT: AlphaFold's own confidence in each residue, 0–100 (higher = surer). It is the model predicting its own accuracy before ever seeing the experiment. We plot the per-structure mean. pLDDT = (1/N) Σᵢ pLDDTᵢ, where pLDDTᵢ is the network's confidence output for residue i.
FRAUD score: the headline number — how wrong the prediction was, weighted by how confident AlphaFold was, so a big error it was sure about counts most. FRAUD = (1/N) Σᵢ (pLDDTᵢ/100) · min(Δᵢ,15)/15, where Δᵢ is residue i's Cα distance from the experiment (Å) after superposition, capped at 15 Å. Runs 0 (perfect) to 1.
Novelty: how little AlphaFold had to go on — 100 minus the highest sequence identity between this protein and any structure released before the 2018-04-30 training cutoff. High = genuinely unseen (100% = nothing similar was ever in the training set). novelty = 100 − maxₚ identity(s, p) over pre-cutoff PDB chains p, with identity = 100 × (matching aligned residues)/(alignment length), from an MMseqs2 search.
Homology: the point colour. High novelty (above 70%) flags the sequence as novel (amber) — AlphaFold had no close template; otherwise a pre-cutoff homolog existed (blue) it could have learned the fold from. novel ⇔ novelty > 70%.
What the metrics mean
TM-score (0–1): overall fold match — above 0.5 is the same fold, above 0.9 near-identical. Cα-RMSD (Å): average backbone distance after best-fit superposition — lower is better (under 2 Å is excellent). lDDT (0–1): local accuracy measured without superposition — above 0.8 is good. Each bar counts how many structures fall in that range.
Take-home: median TM-score 0.964 — most predictions match the experimental fold well, with a long tail that do not.
Read moreShow less — how each metric is calculated
TM-score: overall shape match, 0–1 (above 0.5 = same fold, above 0.9 near-identical), length-normalised. TM = (1/L) Σᵢ 1/(1 + (dᵢ/d₀)²) with dᵢ the aligned-Cα gap after superposition and d₀ = 1.24(L−15)^⅓ − 1.8. Ref: Zhang & Skolnick, Proteins 2004 doi:10.1002/prot.20264.
Cα-RMSD: the average straight-line distance between matching backbone Cα atoms once the two structures are best-fit superposed (Å; lower is better, under ~2 Å excellent). RMSD = √( (1/N) Σᵢ |Pᵢ − (R·Qᵢ + t)|² ), with Pᵢ/Qᵢ the experimental/model Cα coordinates and R,t the rotation and translation from Kabsch superposition.
lDDT: local accuracy with no superposition — the fraction of short-range inter-residue distances the model reproduces, so it is not fooled by a single wrongly-placed domain. lDDT = (1/N) Σᵢ ¼ Σ_t 1[ |d_exp − d_model| < t ] over thresholds t ∈ {0.5, 1, 2, 4} Å and all residue pairs within 15 Å.
Trend over time
The blue line is the mean TM-score of the structures by their deposit month; the red bars count how many were confidently wrong. Binning by deposit date (rather than by when we processed them) gives an even timeline, tracking whether AlphaFold's accuracy on newly-deposited structures is holding steady, improving, or slipping as the PDB keeps growing. Months with fewer than 5 structures are omitted so each point is a meaningful average. A dashed trend line is drawn only if the change over time is statistically significant.
Read moreShow less — how each metric is calculated
Mean TM-score: the month's average shape-match score. TM̄ = (1/M) Σ TM over the M structures deposited that month.
Trend line: a monotonic-trend test over the monthly means — Mann-Kendall (Kendall's τ) for significance, with a robust Theil-Sen slope for the line. Rank-based, so it tolerates the skewed TM distribution and noisy low-count months. Shown only when p < 0.05; otherwise a note reports that no significant trend was found.
Confidently wrong: the count that were both confident and wrong. count( mean pLDDT > 70 AND TM < 0.5 ).
Matched structures
| PDB | UniProt | Protein | Method | Å | Deposited | Novelty % | pLDDT | TM | lDDT | GDT_TS | RMSD | FRAUD | Flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8W77_A | P0ABE7 | Human Consensus Olfactory Receptor OR52c i | EM | 3.61 | 2023-08-30 | — | 90.56 | 0.28 | — | — | — | 0.65 | wrong |
| 8IB8_Q | Q9H2J4 | Phosducin-like protein 3 | EM | 4.42 | 2023-02-09 | 39.40 | 83.78 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 6.19 | 13.88 | 0.61 | ok |
| 8HN0_A | Q14162 | Scavenger receptor class F member 1 | X-ray | 2.20 | 2022-12-06 | 73.60 novel | 88.78 | 0.55 | 0.88 | 18.64 | 8.18 | 0.44 | ok |
| 8TER_A | Q92734 | TRK-fused gene protein Low Complexity Doma | EM | 2.59 | 2023-07-06 | 4.00 | 42.45 | 0.32 | 0.55 | 5.00 | 17.22 | 0.34 | ok |
| 8TEQ_0 | Q92734 | TRK-fused gene protein Low Complexity Doma | EM | 2.84 | 2023-07-06 | 4.00 | 42.50 | 0.22 | 0.46 | 10.34 | 13.01 | 0.29 | ok |
| 8HNA_B | Q14162 | Scavenger receptor class F member 1 | X-ray | 2.60 | 2022-12-07 | 68.00 | 91.10 | 0.65 | 0.84 | 39.54 | 5.94 | 0.28 | ok |
| 8I9Q_Q | Q9H2J4 | Phosducin-like protein 3 | EM | 4.22 | 2023-02-07 | — | 79.69 | 0.70 | — | — | — | 0.24 | ok |
| 8FJA_C | P43358 | Melanoma-associated antigen 4 peptide | EM | 3.00 | 2022-12-19 | — | 90.90 | 0.29 | 0.69 | 40.00 | 4.25 | 0.23 | wrong |
| 8J46_A | P0ABE7 | Olfactory receptor OR52c,Soluble cytochrom | EM | 3.66 | 2023-04-19 | 53.90 | 90.38 | 0.27 | 0.73 | 47.27 | 5.71 | 0.21 | wrong |
| 8IB8_S | P60709 | ACTB protein (Fragment) | EM | 4.42 | 2023-02-09 | — | 95.19 | 0.78 | — | — | — | 0.21 | ok |
| 8HSF_B | P01308 | Insulin B chain | X-ray | 2.90 | 2022-12-19 | 10.00 | 49.07 | 0.52 | 0.45 | 30.56 | 6.84 | 0.18 | ok |
| 8HSK_B | P01308 | Insulin B chain | X-ray | 1.64 | 2022-12-19 | 3.50 | 48.30 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 32.50 | 6.45 | 0.18 | ok |
| 8HOC_A | P63096 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i) su | EM | 3.00 | 2022-12-09 | — | 93.75 | 0.81 | — | — | — | 0.18 | ok |
| 8UQR_A | P04637 | Cellular tumor antigen p53 | X-ray | 1.22 | 2023-10-24 | — | 75.06 | 0.76 | — | — | — | 0.18 | ok |
| 8HN8_A | P63096 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i) su | EM | 3.00 | 2022-12-07 | — | 93.75 | 0.81 | — | — | — | 0.18 | ok |
| 8HQ5_A | P62826 | GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran | X-ray | 2.25 | 2022-12-13 | — | 88.62 | 0.81 | — | — | — | 0.17 | ok |
| 8U1U_B | P63096 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i) su | EM | 3.10 | 2023-09-02 | — | 93.75 | 0.82 | — | — | — | 0.17 | ok |
| 8HQ4_A | P62826 | GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran | X-ray | 2.12 | 2022-12-13 | — | 88.62 | 0.81 | — | — | — | 0.17 | ok |
| 8HTI_A | P63092 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) su | EM | 2.97 | 2022-12-21 | — | 91.31 | 0.82 | — | — | — | 0.17 | ok |
| 8I9Q_D | P50991 | T-complex protein 1 subunit delta | EM | 4.22 | 2023-02-07 | — | 89.69 | 0.82 | — | — | — | 0.16 | ok |
| 8IEO_P | Q9NQ11 | Polyamine-transporting ATPase 13A2 | EM | 3.78 | 2023-02-15 | — | 79.62 | 0.80 | — | — | — | 0.16 | ok |
| 8IEM_P | Q9NQ11 | Polyamine-transporting ATPase 13A2 | EM | 3.35 | 2023-02-15 | — | 79.62 | 0.82 | — | — | — | 0.15 | ok |
| 8HSK_A | P01308 | Insulin A chain | X-ray | 1.64 | 2022-12-19 | 0.00 | 51.25 | 0.31 | 0.46 | 42.86 | 4.89 | 0.14 | ok |
| 8WQR_A | Q16531 | DNA damage-binding protein 1 | EM | 3.08 | 2023-10-12 | — | 92.00 | 0.85 | — | — | — | 0.14 | ok |
| 8IEN_P | Q9NQ11 | Polyamine-transporting ATPase 13A2 | EM | 3.25 | 2023-02-15 | — | 79.62 | 0.83 | — | — | — | 0.14 | ok |
| 8HSF_A | P01308 | Insulin A chain | X-ray | 2.90 | 2022-12-19 | 0.00 | 51.41 | 0.31 | 0.53 | 47.50 | 4.46 | 0.13 | ok |
| 8HTI_G | P59768 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G( | EM | 2.97 | 2022-12-21 | — | 89.56 | 0.87 | — | — | — | 0.12 | ok |
| 8IER_P | Q9NQ11 | Polyamine-transporting ATPase 13A2 | EM | 4.87 | 2023-02-15 | — | 79.62 | 0.85 | — | — | — | 0.12 | ok |
| 8HOC_G | P59768 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G( | EM | 3.00 | 2022-12-09 | — | 89.56 | 0.89 | — | — | — | 0.10 | ok |
| 8HN8_G | P59768 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G( | EM | 3.00 | 2022-12-07 | — | 89.56 | 0.90 | — | — | — | 0.09 | ok |
| 8IB8_D | P50991 | T-complex protein 1 subunit delta | EM | 4.42 | 2023-02-09 | — | 89.69 | 0.90 | — | — | — | 0.09 | ok |
| 8U1U_D | P59768 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G( | EM | 3.10 | 2023-09-02 | — | 89.56 | 0.92 | — | — | — | 0.07 | ok |
| 8IEL_P | Q9NQ11 | Polyamine-transporting ATPase 13A2 | EM | 5.65 | 2023-02-15 | — | 79.62 | 0.92 | — | — | — | 0.07 | ok |
| 8IES_P | Q9NQ11 | Polyamine-transporting ATPase 13A2 | EM | 3.73 | 2023-02-15 | — | 79.62 | 0.92 | — | — | — | 0.06 | ok |
| 8G4Y_A | Q9ULT6 | E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase ZNRF3 | X-ray | 1.41 | 2023-02-10 | — | 50.72 | 0.89 | — | — | — | 0.06 | ok |
| 8IB8_C | P49368 | T-complex protein 1 subunit gamma | EM | 4.42 | 2023-02-09 | — | 89.06 | 0.94 | — | — | — | 0.05 | ok |
| 8UN5_A | P01116 | GTPase KRas | X-ray | 1.31 | 2023-10-18 | — | 91.50 | 0.94 | — | — | — | 0.05 | ok |
| 8UN4_A | P01116 | GTPase KRas | X-ray | 1.57 | 2023-10-18 | — | 91.50 | 0.94 | — | — | — | 0.05 | ok |
| 8IB8_H | P50990 | T-complex protein 1 subunit theta | EM | 4.42 | 2023-02-09 | — | 87.69 | 0.94 | — | — | — | 0.05 | ok |
| 8IB8_E | P48643 | T-complex protein 1 subunit epsilon | EM | 4.42 | 2023-02-09 | — | 89.38 | 0.94 | — | — | — | 0.05 | ok |
| 8TDV_A | Q9Y3Z3 | Deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohyd | EM | 3.44 | 2023-07-05 | — | 88.19 | 0.94 | — | — | — | 0.05 | ok |
| 8UN3_A | P01116 | GTPase KRas | X-ray | 2.07 | 2023-10-18 | — | 91.50 | 0.95 | — | — | — | 0.05 | ok |
| 8HRL_A | Q9BYF1 | Processed angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 | EM | 2.80 | 2022-12-15 | — | 90.69 | 0.95 | — | — | — | 0.05 | ok |
| 8IB8_G | Q99832 | T-complex protein 1 subunit eta | EM | 4.42 | 2023-02-09 | — | 88.88 | 0.95 | — | — | — | 0.04 | ok |
| 8BX6_A | O60674 | Tyrosine-protein kinase JAK2 | X-ray | 1.50 | 2022-12-08 | — | 86.88 | 0.95 | — | — | — | 0.04 | ok |
| 8BX9_A | O60674 | Tyrosine-protein kinase JAK2 | X-ray | 1.40 | 2022-12-08 | — | 86.88 | 0.95 | — | — | — | 0.04 | ok |
| 8OOJ_A | P27707 | Deoxycytidine kinase | X-ray | 2.10 | 2023-04-05 | — | 88.44 | 0.95 | — | — | — | 0.04 | ok |
| 8P45_A | Q86WV6 | Stimulator of interferon genes protein | X-ray | 3.23 | 2023-05-19 | — | 83.75 | 0.95 | — | — | — | 0.04 | ok |
| 8ORW_A | Q86WV6 | Stimulator of interferon protein | X-ray | 2.95 | 2023-04-17 | — | 83.75 | 0.95 | — | — | — | 0.04 | ok |
| 8HRZ_M | Q9UNZ2 | NSFL1 cofactor p47 | X-ray | 2.70 | 2022-12-16 | — | 74.06 | 0.95 | — | — | — | 0.04 | ok |
| 8UD9_D | O14818 | Proteasome subunit alpha type-7 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 94.38 | 0.96 | — | — | — | 0.04 | ok |
| 8BXH_A | O60674 | Tyrosine-protein kinase JAK2 | X-ray | 1.30 | 2022-12-08 | — | 86.88 | 0.96 | — | — | — | 0.04 | ok |
| 8OMR_B | Q9H974 | Queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase accessory | EM | 3.30 | 2023-03-31 | — | 89.75 | 0.96 | — | — | — | 0.04 | ok |
| 8UD9_B | P25787 | Proteasome subunit alpha type-2 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 94.75 | 0.96 | — | — | — | 0.04 | ok |
| 8IB8_B | P78371 | T-complex protein 1 subunit beta | EM | 4.42 | 2023-02-09 | — | 89.81 | 0.96 | — | — | — | 0.04 | ok |
| 8WD4_A | P00533 | Epidermal growth factor receptor | X-ray | 2.55 | 2023-09-14 | — | 75.94 | 0.95 | — | — | — | 0.04 | ok |
| 8JWJ_B | P62837 | Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 D2 | X-ray | 2.96 | 2023-06-29 | — | 96.50 | 0.96 | — | — | — | 0.03 | ok |
| 8OMR_A | Q9BXR0 | Queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase catalytic | EM | 3.30 | 2023-03-31 | — | 93.69 | 0.96 | — | — | — | 0.03 | ok |
| 8HRK_A | Q9BYF1 | Processed angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 | EM | 3.30 | 2022-12-15 | — | 90.69 | 0.96 | — | — | — | 0.03 | ok |
| 8HN1_A | P35348 | Alpha-1A adrenergic receptor | EM | 2.90 | 2022-12-06 | — | 70.31 | 0.95 | — | — | — | 0.03 | ok |
| 8UD9_E | P28066 | Proteasome subunit alpha type-5 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 94.12 | 0.96 | — | — | — | 0.03 | ok |
| 8IB8_A | P17987 | T-complex protein 1 subunit alpha | EM | 4.42 | 2023-02-09 | — | 89.00 | 0.96 | — | — | — | 0.03 | ok |
| 8IB8_F | P40227 | T-complex protein 1 subunit zeta | EM | 4.42 | 2023-02-09 | — | 89.88 | 0.96 | — | — | — | 0.03 | ok |
| 8A2X_A | Q86WV6 | Stimulator of interferon protein | X-ray | 3.00 | 2022-06-06 | — | 83.75 | 0.96 | — | — | — | 0.03 | ok |
| 8C8J_A | O00370 | RNA-directed DNA polymerase | X-ray | 2.10 | 2023-01-20 | — | 86.56 | 0.97 | — | — | — | 0.03 | ok |
| 8UD9_C | P25789 | Proteasome subunit alpha type-4 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 93.50 | 0.97 | — | — | — | 0.03 | ok |
| 8HR0_C | O75396 | Vesicle-trafficking protein SEC22b | X-ray | 3.34 | 2022-12-14 | — | 83.50 | 0.97 | — | — | — | 0.02 | ok |
| 8HPP_C | Q9NXZ1 | Sarcoma antigen 1 | X-ray | 3.00 | 2022-12-12 | — | 50.19 | 0.95 | — | — | — | 0.02 | ok |
| 8K9R_B | P08174 | Green fluorescent protein,Complement decay | EM | 2.68 | 2023-08-01 | — | 78.25 | 0.97 | — | — | — | 0.02 | ok |
| 8HPP_A | Q68E01 | Integrator complex subunit 3 | X-ray | 3.00 | 2022-12-12 | — | 83.06 | 0.97 | — | — | — | 0.02 | ok |
| 8HRZ_A | P55072 | Transitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPase | X-ray | 2.70 | 2022-12-16 | — | 82.56 | 0.97 | — | — | — | 0.02 | ok |
| 8UW3_A | O00370 | LINE-1 retrotransposable element ORF2 prot | EM | 3.20 | 2023-11-06 | — | 86.56 | 0.97 | — | — | — | 0.02 | ok |
| 8BXC_A | O60674 | Tyrosine-protein kinase JAK2 | X-ray | 1.90 | 2022-12-08 | — | 86.88 | 0.98 | — | — | — | 0.02 | ok |
| 8HRN_A | Q9BYF1 | Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 | EM | 3.90 | 2022-12-15 | — | 90.69 | 0.98 | — | — | — | 0.02 | ok |
| 8HRU_A | Q9BYF1 | Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 | EM | 3.90 | 2022-12-16 | — | 90.69 | 0.98 | — | — | — | 0.02 | ok |
| 8WQR_B | Q9C0C7 | Activating molecule in BECN1-regulated aut | EM | 3.08 | 2023-10-12 | — | 48.75 | 0.96 | — | — | — | 0.02 | ok |
| 8FJA_A | Q861F7 | MHC class I antigen | EM | 3.00 | 2022-12-19 | — | 88.19 | 0.98 | — | — | — | 0.02 | ok |
| 8FJA_B | P61769 | Beta-2-microglobulin | EM | 3.00 | 2022-12-19 | — | 94.06 | 0.98 | — | — | — | 0.02 | ok |
| 8FJB_B | P61769 | Beta-2-microglobulin | EM | 3.06 | 2022-12-19 | — | 94.06 | 0.98 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8FJB_A | Q861F7 | MHC class I antigen | EM | 3.06 | 2022-12-19 | — | 88.19 | 0.98 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8UD9_L | P28074 | Proteasome subunit beta type-5 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 82.38 | 0.98 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8HR0_B | O95486 | Protein transport protein Sec24A | X-ray | 3.34 | 2022-12-14 | — | 75.50 | 0.98 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8X6P_A | P62942 | Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP1A | X-ray | 1.05 | 2023-11-21 | — | 96.25 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8UD9_I | Q99436 | Proteasome subunit beta type-7 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 90.38 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8K9T_B | P08174 | Green fluorescent protein,Complement decay | EM | 2.66 | 2023-08-01 | — | 78.25 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8UD9_G | P25788 | Proteasome subunit alpha type-3 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 94.50 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8HTI_B | P62873 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G( | EM | 2.97 | 2022-12-21 | — | 97.06 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8UJY_A | P61964 | WD repeat-containing protein 5 | X-ray | 2.01 | 2023-10-11 | — | 93.31 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8HOC_B | P62873 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G( | EM | 3.00 | 2022-12-09 | — | 97.06 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8FH8_A | P15121 | Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1 | X-ray | 1.60 | 2022-12-13 | — | 98.31 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 7Y2R_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.20 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 7Y2W_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.20 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 7Y2U_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.20 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 7Y2S_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.20 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8UD9_H | P28072 | Proteasome subunit beta type-6 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 88.69 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8HN8_B | P62873 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G( | EM | 3.00 | 2022-12-07 | — | 97.06 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8FH6_A | P15121 | Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1 | X-ray | 1.95 | 2022-12-13 | — | 98.31 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 7Y2V_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.20 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 7Y2T_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.20 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8U1U_C | P62873 | Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G( | EM | 3.10 | 2023-09-02 | — | 97.06 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8HR0_A | Q15436 | Protein transport protein Sec23A | X-ray | 3.34 | 2022-12-14 | — | 92.69 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.01 | ok |
| 8FH9_A | P15121 | Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1 | X-ray | 1.70 | 2022-12-13 | — | 98.31 | 0.99 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 8UD9_J | P49720 | Proteasome subunit beta type-3 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 97.31 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 8FH5_A | P15121 | Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1 | X-ray | 1.62 | 2022-12-13 | — | 98.31 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2X_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.50 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 8UD9_A | P60900 | Proteasome subunit alpha type-6 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 96.06 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 8FH7_A | P15121 | Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1 | X-ray | 1.45 | 2022-12-13 | — | 98.31 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 8UD9_F | P25786 | Proteasome subunit alpha type-1 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 91.88 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 8UD9_N | P28070 | Proteasome subunit beta type-4 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 87.44 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2A_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.20 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2C_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.20 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2J_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.25 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2F_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.20 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2E_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.20 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2Q_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.35 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2O_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.25 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2N_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.25 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2M_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.25 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2L_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.25 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2K_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.25 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2I_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.40 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2H_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.20 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 7Y2G_A | P00918 | Carbonic anhydrase 2 | X-ray | 1.20 | 2022-06-09 | — | 97.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 8UD9_M | P20618 | Proteasome subunit beta type-1 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 91.38 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
| 8UD9_K | P49721 | Proteasome subunit beta type-2 | EM | 2.04 | 2023-09-28 | — | 96.69 | 1.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | ok |
Click a column header to sort. FRAUD = confidence-weighted error; a structure is flagged confidently wrong when mean pLDDT > 70 yet TM-score < 0.5.