Release week 2022-03-23

Jump to:

114

structures analysed (20 full · 17.5%)

108.8%

confidently wrong

108.8%

novel sequences

108.8%

novel & wrong

0.935

median TM-score

⭐ This week's notable releases

10 novel sequences, 10 confidently wrong. Highlight: Transmembrane protein 106B.

PDB	Protein	Flags	Why it matters
7U11_A ↗	Transmembrane protein 106B	novel · 100% confidently wrong	Genuinely unseen sequence (0% identity to anything AlphaFold trained on) — and AlphaFold got the fold wrong despite high confidence.
7U18_A ↗	TMEM106B protein	novel · 100% confidently wrong	Genuinely unseen sequence (0% identity to anything AlphaFold trained on) — and AlphaFold got the fold wrong despite high confidence.
7U16_A ↗	Transmembrane protein 106B	novel · 100% confidently wrong	Genuinely unseen sequence (0% identity to anything AlphaFold trained on) — and AlphaFold got the fold wrong despite high confidence.
7U13_A ↗	Transmembrane protein 106B	novel · 100% confidently wrong	Genuinely unseen sequence (0% identity to anything AlphaFold trained on) — and AlphaFold got the fold wrong despite high confidence.
7U10_A ↗	Transmembrane protein 106B	novel · 100% confidently wrong	Genuinely unseen sequence (0% identity to anything AlphaFold trained on) — and AlphaFold got the fold wrong despite high confidence.
7U14_A ↗	Transmembrane protein 106B	novel · 100% confidently wrong	Genuinely unseen sequence (0% identity to anything AlphaFold trained on) — and AlphaFold got the fold wrong despite high confidence.

see all 114 structures ↓

Zoomed into the red "confidently wrong" box above (pLDDT ≥ 70, TM < 0.5) — the structures AlphaFold got confidently wrong.

The worst offenders ranked, one row per protein (AlphaFold has one model per sequence, so repeat depositions are collapsed — “×N” marks how many structures of that protein exist; the worst is shown). Each row joins what AlphaFold claimed (blue, pLDDT/100) to what the experiment showed (red, TM-score) — the longer the bar, the bigger the miss. Hover a dot to preview its Cα-deviation ribbon; click to open the full entry.

How to read this

Every point is one experimental protein structure. The horizontal axis is AlphaFold's own confidence in its prediction (mean pLDDT, 0–100). The vertical axis is how well that blind prediction actually matches the experiment (TM-score, 0–1; above 0.5 means the same fold, above 0.9 near-identical). Marker size grows with the FRAUD score (confidence-weighted error).

Cutoff: the shaded red box is the "confidently wrong" zone — AlphaFold was confident (mean pLDDT above 70) yet the fold is wrong (TM-score below 0.5). A predictor that had truly solved folding would leave that box empty.

Take-home: 10 of 114 structures (8.8%) are confidently wrong; median TM-score is 0.935.

Read moreShow less — how each metric is calculated

TM-score: how similar the two 3D shapes are overall, 0–1 (a random pair scores ~0.17, an identical fold ~1). Length-normalised so large and small proteins compare fairly. TM = (1/L) Σᵢ 1/(1 + (dᵢ/d₀)²) — dᵢ is the gap between the i-th aligned Cα atoms after best-fit superposition, and d₀ = 1.24(L−15)^⅓ − 1.8 sets the distance scale for length L. Ref: Zhang & Skolnick, Proteins 2004 doi:10.1002/prot.20264; computed with TM-align, doi:10.1093/nar/gki524.

pLDDT: AlphaFold's own confidence in each residue, 0–100 (higher = surer). It is the model predicting its own accuracy before ever seeing the experiment. We plot the per-structure mean. pLDDT = (1/N) Σᵢ pLDDTᵢ, where pLDDTᵢ is the network's confidence output for residue i.

FRAUD score: the headline number — how wrong the prediction was, weighted by how confident AlphaFold was, so a big error it was sure about counts most. FRAUD = (1/N) Σᵢ (pLDDTᵢ/100) · min(Δᵢ,15)/15, where Δᵢ is residue i's Cα distance from the experiment (Å) after superposition, capped at 15 Å. Runs 0 (perfect) to 1.

Novelty: how little AlphaFold had to go on — 100 minus the highest sequence identity between this protein and any structure released before the 2018-04-30 training cutoff. High = genuinely unseen (100% = nothing similar was ever in the training set). novelty = 100 − maxₚ identity(s, p) over pre-cutoff PDB chains p, with identity = 100 × (matching aligned residues)/(alignment length), from an MMseqs2 search.

Homology: the point colour. High novelty (above 70%) flags the sequence as novel (amber) — AlphaFold had no close template; otherwise a pre-cutoff homolog existed (blue) it could have learned the fold from. novel ⇔ novelty > 70%.

What the metrics mean

TM-score (0–1): overall fold match — above 0.5 is the same fold, above 0.9 near-identical. Cα-RMSD (Å): average backbone distance after best-fit superposition — lower is better (under 2 Å is excellent). lDDT (0–1): local accuracy measured without superposition — above 0.8 is good. Each bar counts how many structures fall in that range.

Take-home: median TM-score 0.935 — most predictions match the experimental fold well, with a long tail that do not.

Read moreShow less — how each metric is calculated

TM-score: overall shape match, 0–1 (above 0.5 = same fold, above 0.9 near-identical), length-normalised. TM = (1/L) Σᵢ 1/(1 + (dᵢ/d₀)²) with dᵢ the aligned-Cα gap after superposition and d₀ = 1.24(L−15)^⅓ − 1.8. Ref: Zhang & Skolnick, Proteins 2004 doi:10.1002/prot.20264.

Cα-RMSD: the average straight-line distance between matching backbone Cα atoms once the two structures are best-fit superposed (Å; lower is better, under ~2 Å excellent). RMSD = √( (1/N) Σᵢ |Pᵢ − (R·Qᵢ + t)|² ), with Pᵢ/Qᵢ the experimental/model Cα coordinates and R,t the rotation and translation from Kabsch superposition.

lDDT: local accuracy with no superposition — the fraction of short-range inter-residue distances the model reproduces, so it is not fooled by a single wrongly-placed domain. lDDT = (1/N) Σᵢ ¼ Σ_t 1[ |d_exp − d_model| < t ] over thresholds t ∈ {0.5, 1, 2, 4} Å and all residue pairs within 15 Å.

Trend over time

The blue line is the mean TM-score of the structures by their deposit month; the red bars count how many were confidently wrong. Binning by deposit date (rather than by when we processed them) gives an even timeline, tracking whether AlphaFold's accuracy on newly-deposited structures is holding steady, improving, or slipping as the PDB keeps growing. Months with fewer than 5 structures are omitted so each point is a meaningful average. A dashed trend line is drawn only if the change over time is statistically significant.

Read moreShow less — how each metric is calculated

Mean TM-score: the month's average shape-match score. TM̄ = (1/M) Σ TM over the M structures deposited that month.

Trend line: a monotonic-trend test over the monthly means — Mann-Kendall (Kendall's τ) for significance, with a robust Theil-Sen slope for the line. Rank-based, so it tolerates the skewed TM distribution and noisy low-count months. Shown only when p < 0.05; otherwise a note reports that no significant trend was found.

Confidently wrong: the count that were both confident and wrong. count( mean pLDDT > 70 AND TM < 0.5 ).

Matched structures

PDB	UniProt	Protein	Method	Å	Deposited	Novelty %	pLDDT	TM	lDDT	GDT_TS	RMSD	FRAUD	Flag
7U11_A	Q9NUM4	Transmembrane protein 106B	EM	3.20	2022-02-19	100.00 novel	94.39	0.17	0.54	0.56	27.20	0.88	wrong
7U18_A	Q9NUM4	TMEM106B protein	EM	2.70	2022-02-20	100.00 novel	94.39	0.17	0.54	0.56	27.12	0.87	wrong
7U16_A	Q9NUM4	Transmembrane protein 106B	EM	2.70	2022-02-19	100.00 novel	94.39	0.17	0.54	0.56	27.12	0.87	wrong
7U13_A	Q9NUM4	Transmembrane protein 106B	EM	2.90	2022-02-19	100.00 novel	94.39	0.17	0.54	0.56	27.14	0.87	wrong
7U10_A	Q9NUM4	Transmembrane protein 106B	EM	3.00	2022-02-19	100.00 novel	94.39	0.17	0.54	0.56	27.16	0.87	wrong
7U14_A	Q9NUM4	Transmembrane protein 106B	EM	4.50	2022-02-19	100.00 novel	94.39	0.16	0.54	0.56	27.14	0.87	wrong
7U12_A	Q9NUM4	Transmembrane protein 106B	EM	3.50	2022-02-19	100.00 novel	94.39	0.18	0.53	0.56	27.07	0.87	wrong
7U17_A	Q9NUM4	Transmembrane protein 106B	EM	3.00	2022-02-19	100.00 novel	94.39	0.16	0.51	0.93	26.43	0.87	wrong
7U15_A	Q9NUM4	Transmembrane protein 106B	EM	3.00	2022-02-19	100.00 novel	94.39	0.16	0.51	0.93	26.43	0.87	wrong
7QJX_A	P10636	Microtubule-associated protein tau	EM	2.99	2021-12-17	0.00	67.87	0.24	0.46	0.00	24.68	0.66	ok
7QKJ_A	P10636	Microtubule-associated protein tau	EM	3.26	2021-12-17	0.00	67.98	0.25	0.47	1.00	23.63	0.63	ok
7U0Z_A	P10636	Isoform Tau-E of Microtubule-associated pr	EM	4.20	2022-02-19	0.00	66.23	0.22	0.45	1.36	21.42	0.60	ok
7T3U_A	Q14573	Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type	EM	3.70	2021-12-08	38.80	80.95	0.68	0.85	8.89	13.76	0.56	ok
7TYH_E	O60895	Receptor activity-modifying protein 2	EM	3.30	2022-02-13	0.00	96.49	0.65	0.82	38.14	5.25	0.29	ok
7TYY_E	O60895	Receptor activity-modifying protein 2	EM	3.00	2022-02-14	0.00	96.02	0.69	0.89	37.87	5.31	0.29	ok
7P2K_A	Q6ZNA4	E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Arkadia	NMR	—	2021-07-06	1.50	81.85	0.60	0.62	30.43	8.82	0.28	ok
7TYF_E	O60894	Receptor activity-modifying protein 1	EM	2.20	2022-02-13	—	89.75	0.72	—	—	—	0.25	ok
7TZF_E	O60896	Receptor activity-modifying protein 3	EM	2.40	2022-02-15	—	87.56	0.75	—	—	—	0.22	ok
7TYW_E	O60894	Receptor activity-modifying protein 1	EM	3.00	2022-02-14	2.20	95.72	0.65	0.80	51.16	3.52	0.20	ok
7WUB_D	P55072	Transitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPase	EM	3.00	2022-02-08	—	82.56	0.76	—	—	—	0.19	ok
7WUB_C	P55072	Transitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPase	EM	3.00	2022-02-08	—	82.56	0.76	—	—	—	0.19	ok
7WUB_A	P55072	Transitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPase	EM	3.00	2022-02-08	—	82.56	0.76	—	—	—	0.19	ok
7VL8_A	P63096	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i) su	EM	2.90	2021-10-02	—	93.75	0.82	—	—	—	0.17	ok
7VL9_A	P63096	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i) su	EM	2.60	2021-10-02	—	93.75	0.82	—	—	—	0.17	ok
7TYH_P	P01258	Calcitonin	EM	3.30	2022-02-13	15.70	62.15	0.43	0.72	39.84	4.82	0.16	ok
7VLA_A	P63096	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i) su	EM	2.70	2021-10-02	—	93.75	0.83	—	—	—	0.16	ok
7TYO_P	P01258	Calcitonin	EM	2.70	2022-02-14	15.70	62.15	0.44	0.76	43.75	4.69	0.16	ok
7EEK_A	P02768	Serum albumin	X-ray	2.50	2021-03-18	—	92.69	0.84	—	—	—	0.15	ok
7T3T_A	Q14573	Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type	EM	3.80	2021-12-08	—	73.44	0.80	—	—	—	0.15	ok
7FB5_B	Q9H6L5	Reticulophagy regulator 1	X-ray	2.84	2021-07-08	100.00 novel	72.67	0.34	0.78	51.19	3.28	0.14	wrong
7WKX_E	Q16552	Interleukin-17A	X-ray	2.81	2022-01-12	—	84.31	0.83	—	—	—	0.14	ok
7TYL_G	P59768	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	3.30	2022-02-13	—	89.56	0.85	—	—	—	0.14	ok
7T3R_A	Q14573	Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type	EM	3.40	2021-12-08	—	73.44	0.83	—	—	—	0.13	ok
7TYO_A	P63092	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) su	EM	2.70	2022-02-14	—	91.31	0.86	—	—	—	0.13	ok
7TYF_A	P63092	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) su	EM	2.20	2022-02-13	—	91.31	0.87	—	—	—	0.12	ok
7TYL_A	P63092	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) su	EM	3.30	2022-02-13	—	91.31	0.87	—	—	—	0.12	ok
7TYW_A	P63092	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) su	EM	3.00	2022-02-14	—	91.31	0.87	—	—	—	0.12	ok
7T3Q_A	Q14573	Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type	EM	3.30	2021-12-08	—	73.44	0.84	—	—	—	0.12	ok
7TYH_A	P63092	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) su	EM	3.30	2022-02-13	—	91.31	0.87	—	—	—	0.12	ok
7TZF_A	P63092	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) su	EM	2.40	2022-02-15	—	91.31	0.87	—	—	—	0.12	ok
7TYY_A	P63092	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) su	EM	3.00	2022-02-14	—	91.31	0.87	—	—	—	0.12	ok
7NAL_A	Q6SZW1	NAD(+) hydrolase SARM1	EM	3.00	2021-06-21	—	85.69	0.86	—	—	—	0.12	ok
7T3P_A	Q14573	Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type	EM	3.20	2021-12-08	—	73.44	0.85	—	—	—	0.11	ok
7TYH_G	P59768	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	3.30	2022-02-13	—	89.56	0.89	—	—	—	0.10	ok
7VL9_L	Q16663	CCL15(26-92)	EM	2.60	2021-10-02	—	78.00	0.87	—	—	—	0.10	ok
7T4R_A	P07204	Thrombomodulin	EM	3.30	2021-12-10	—	78.62	0.88	—	—	—	0.10	ok
7VLA_L	Q16663	CCL15(27-92)	EM	2.70	2021-10-02	—	78.00	0.88	—	—	—	0.09	ok
7TYL_R	P30988	Calcitonin receptor	EM	3.30	2022-02-13	—	78.69	0.89	—	—	—	0.09	ok
7TZF_R	P30988	Calcitonin receptor	EM	2.40	2022-02-15	—	78.69	0.89	—	—	—	0.08	ok
7TYW_G	P59768	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	3.00	2022-02-14	—	89.56	0.91	—	—	—	0.08	ok
7TYF_R	P30988	Calcitonin receptor	EM	2.20	2022-02-13	—	78.69	0.90	—	—	—	0.08	ok
7TYO_G	P59768	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	2.70	2022-02-14	—	89.56	0.91	—	—	—	0.08	ok
7VL8_R	P32246	C-C chemokine receptor type 1	EM	2.90	2021-10-02	—	83.19	0.93	—	—	—	0.06	ok
7VLA_R	P32246	C-C chemokine receptor type 1	EM	2.70	2021-10-02	—	83.19	0.93	—	—	—	0.06	ok
7VL9_R	P32246	C-C chemokine receptor type 1	EM	2.60	2021-10-02	—	83.19	0.93	—	—	—	0.06	ok
7TZF_G	P59768	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	2.40	2022-02-15	—	89.56	0.93	—	—	—	0.06	ok
7TYY_G	P59768	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	3.00	2022-02-14	—	89.56	0.93	—	—	—	0.06	ok
7TYY_R	P30988	Calcitonin receptor	EM	3.00	2022-02-14	—	78.69	0.93	—	—	—	0.06	ok
7N3A_A	P22914	Gamma-crystallin S	X-ray	1.50	2021-05-31	—	95.31	0.94	—	—	—	0.06	ok
7TYF_G	P59768	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	2.20	2022-02-13	—	89.56	0.95	—	—	—	0.05	ok
7TYH_R	P30988	Calcitonin receptor	EM	3.30	2022-02-13	—	78.69	0.94	—	—	—	0.05	ok
7VLA_G	P59768	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	2.70	2021-10-02	—	89.56	0.95	—	—	—	0.05	ok
7TYW_R	P30988	Calcitonin receptor	EM	3.00	2022-02-14	—	78.69	0.94	—	—	—	0.05	ok
7VL8_G	P59768	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	2.90	2021-10-02	—	89.56	0.95	—	—	—	0.05	ok
7N36_A	P22914	Gamma-crystallin S	X-ray	2.00	2021-05-31	—	95.31	0.95	—	—	—	0.04	ok
7NAK_A	Q6SZW1	NAD(+) hydrolase SARM1	EM	2.90	2021-06-21	—	85.69	0.95	—	—	—	0.04	ok
7NNJ_A	Q9NZJ9	Diphosphoinositol polyphosphate phosphohyd	X-ray	1.75	2021-02-24	—	85.00	0.96	—	—	—	0.04	ok
7N38_A	P22914	Gamma-crystallin S	X-ray	1.22	2021-05-31	—	95.31	0.96	—	—	—	0.04	ok
7TYO_R	P30988	Calcitonin receptor	EM	2.70	2022-02-14	—	78.69	0.96	—	—	—	0.03	ok
7NAG_A	Q6SZW1	Sterile alpha and TIR motif-containing pro	X-ray	1.72	2021-06-21	—	85.69	0.96	—	—	—	0.03	ok
7NAI_A	Q6SZW1	Sterile alpha and TIR motif-containing pro	X-ray	1.74	2021-06-21	—	85.69	0.96	—	—	—	0.03	ok
7N37_A	P22914	Gamma-crystallin S	X-ray	1.30	2021-05-31	—	95.31	0.97	—	—	—	0.03	ok
7NAJ_A	Q6SZW1	Sterile alpha and TIR motif-containing pro	X-ray	1.60	2021-06-21	—	85.69	0.96	—	—	—	0.03	ok
7NAH_A	Q6SZW1	Sterile alpha and TIR motif-containing pro	X-ray	1.79	2021-06-21	—	85.69	0.96	—	—	—	0.03	ok
7VL9_G	P59768	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	2.60	2021-10-02	—	89.56	0.97	—	—	—	0.03	ok
7Z7F_A	Q9Y5A9	YTH domain-containing family protein 2	X-ray	1.95	2022-03-15	—	59.50	0.96	—	—	—	0.03	ok
7L1C_A	P04439	HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A	X-ray	1.96	2020-12-14	—	87.12	0.98	—	—	—	0.02	ok
7L1D_B	P61769	Beta-2-microglobulin	X-ray	3.11	2020-12-14	—	94.06	0.98	—	—	—	0.02	ok
7L1B_A	P04439	HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A	X-ray	2.04	2020-12-14	—	87.12	0.98	—	—	—	0.02	ok
7RRG_B	P61769	Beta-2-microglobulin	X-ray	2.12	2021-08-09	—	94.06	0.98	—	—	—	0.02	ok
7NR6_A	Q9NV35	Probable 8-oxo-dGTP diphosphatase NUDT15	X-ray	1.80	2021-03-03	—	92.75	0.98	—	—	—	0.02	ok
7L1C_B	P61769	Beta-2-microglobulin	X-ray	1.96	2020-12-14	—	94.06	0.98	—	—	—	0.02	ok
7L1D_A	P04439	HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A	X-ray	3.11	2020-12-14	—	87.12	0.98	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7A6T_A	P49366	Deoxyhypusine synthase	X-ray	1.66	2020-08-26	—	94.06	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7FHS_A	Q13627	Dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-	X-ray	2.42	2021-07-30	—	66.44	0.98	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7FHT_A	Q13627	Dual specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-	X-ray	2.68	2021-07-30	—	66.44	0.98	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7TYL_B	P62873	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	3.30	2022-02-13	—	97.06	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7R54_A	Q9NR97	Toll-like receptor 8	X-ray	2.84	2022-02-10	—	86.12	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7N39_A	P22914	Gamma-crystallin S	X-ray	1.56	2021-05-31	—	95.31	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7A6S_A	P49366	Deoxyhypusine synthase	X-ray	1.75	2020-08-26	—	94.06	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7L1B_B	P61769	Beta-2-microglobulin	X-ray	2.04	2020-12-14	—	94.06	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7NPM_AAA	P03950	Angiogenin	X-ray	1.86	2021-02-27	—	89.81	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7R53_A	Q9NR97	Toll-like receptor 8	X-ray	3.12	2022-02-10	—	86.12	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7RRG_A	P04439	HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A	X-ray	2.12	2021-08-09	—	87.12	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7TYH_B	P62873	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	3.30	2022-02-13	—	97.06	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7TYY_B	P62873	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	3.00	2022-02-14	—	97.06	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7RWH_A	P31153	S-adenosylmethionine synthase isoform type	X-ray	1.17	2021-08-19	—	96.06	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7RW7_A	P31153	S-adenosylmethionine synthase isoform type	X-ray	1.19	2021-08-19	—	96.06	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7PSU_A	P68400	Casein kinase II subunit alpha	X-ray	1.77	2021-09-23	—	88.94	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7RWG_A	P31153	S-adenosylmethionine synthase isoform type	X-ray	0.97	2021-08-19	—	96.06	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7TYW_B	P62873	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	3.00	2022-02-14	—	97.06	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7N3B_A	P22914	Gamma-crystallin S	X-ray	2.09	2021-05-31	—	95.31	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7R52_A	Q9NR97	Toll-like receptor 8	X-ray	2.94	2022-02-10	—	86.12	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7RW5_A	P31153	S-adenosylmethionine synthase isoform type	X-ray	2.48	2021-08-19	—	96.06	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7TYO_B	P62873	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	2.70	2022-02-14	—	97.06	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7T4S_F	O60462	Neuropilin-2	EM	3.10	2021-12-10	—	78.62	0.99	—	—	—	0.01	ok
7VXG_A	Q06124	Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor	X-ray	2.10	2021-11-12	—	85.94	0.99	—	—	—	0.00	ok
7TZF_B	P62873	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	2.40	2022-02-15	—	97.06	1.00	—	—	—	0.00	ok
7E3M_A	P51449	Nuclear receptor ROR-gamma	X-ray	2.80	2021-02-09	—	74.19	0.99	—	—	—	0.00	ok
7VLA_B	P62873	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	2.70	2021-10-02	—	97.06	1.00	—	—	—	0.00	ok
7VL8_B	P62873	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	2.90	2021-10-02	—	97.06	1.00	—	—	—	0.00	ok
7TYF_B	P62873	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	2.20	2022-02-13	—	97.06	1.00	—	—	—	0.00	ok
7VL9_B	P62873	Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(	EM	2.60	2021-10-02	—	97.06	1.00	—	—	—	0.00	ok
7NS7_A	P21549	L-alanine:glyoxylate aminotransferase	X-ray	2.20	2021-03-05	—	98.31	1.00	—	—	—	0.00	ok

Click a column header to sort. FRAUD = confidence-weighted error; a structure is flagged confidently wrong when mean pLDDT > 70 yet TM-score < 0.5.