Live Stats, next update: Wed 02 Sep
Human PDBs Analysed
Confidently Wrong
Novel + Confidently Wrong
DB size
Visitors
Full statistics →
New PDB Depositions vs. Their Blind AlphaFold Predictions — A Running Test of “Is Folding Solved?”

Release week 2019-11-13

79
structures analysed (70 full · 88.6%)
45.1%
confidently wrong
11.3%
novel sequences
00.0%
novel & wrong
0.959
median TM-score

Zoomed into the red "confidently wrong" box above (pLDDT ≥ 70, TM < 0.5) — the structures AlphaFold got confidently wrong.

The worst offenders ranked, one row per protein (AlphaFold has one model per sequence, so repeat depositions are collapsed — “×N” marks how many structures of that protein exist; the worst is shown). Each row joins what AlphaFold claimed (blue, pLDDT/100) to what the experiment showed (red, TM-score) — the longer the bar, the bigger the miss. Hover a dot to preview its Cα-deviation ribbon; click to open the full entry.

How to read this

Every point is one experimental protein structure. The horizontal axis is AlphaFold's own confidence in its prediction (mean pLDDT, 0–100). The vertical axis is how well that blind prediction actually matches the experiment (TM-score, 0–1; above 0.5 means the same fold, above 0.9 near-identical). Marker size grows with the FRAUD score (confidence-weighted error).

Cutoff: the shaded red box is the "confidently wrong" zone — AlphaFold was confident (mean pLDDT above 70) yet the fold is wrong (TM-score below 0.5). A predictor that had truly solved folding would leave that box empty.

Take-home: 4 of 79 structures (5.1%) are confidently wrong; median TM-score is 0.959.

Read moreShow less — how each metric is calculated

TM-score: how similar the two 3D shapes are overall, 0–1 (a random pair scores ~0.17, an identical fold ~1). Length-normalised so large and small proteins compare fairly. TM = (1/L) Σᵢ 1/(1 + (dᵢ/d₀)²) — dᵢ is the gap between the i-th aligned Cα atoms after best-fit superposition, and d₀ = 1.24(L−15)^⅓ − 1.8 sets the distance scale for length L. Ref: Zhang & Skolnick, Proteins 2004 doi:10.1002/prot.20264; computed with TM-align, doi:10.1093/nar/gki524.

pLDDT: AlphaFold's own confidence in each residue, 0–100 (higher = surer). It is the model predicting its own accuracy before ever seeing the experiment. We plot the per-structure mean. pLDDT = (1/N) Σᵢ pLDDTᵢ, where pLDDTᵢ is the network's confidence output for residue i.

FRAUD score: the headline number — how wrong the prediction was, weighted by how confident AlphaFold was, so a big error it was sure about counts most. FRAUD = (1/N) Σᵢ (pLDDTᵢ/100) · min(Δᵢ,15)/15, where Δᵢ is residue i's Cα distance from the experiment (Å) after superposition, capped at 15 Å. Runs 0 (perfect) to 1.

Novelty: how little AlphaFold had to go on — 100 minus the highest sequence identity between this protein and any structure released before the 2018-04-30 training cutoff. High = genuinely unseen (100% = nothing similar was ever in the training set). novelty = 100 − maxₚ identity(s, p) over pre-cutoff PDB chains p, with identity = 100 × (matching aligned residues)/(alignment length), from an MMseqs2 search.

Homology: the point colour. High novelty (above 70%) flags the sequence as novel (amber) — AlphaFold had no close template; otherwise a pre-cutoff homolog existed (blue) it could have learned the fold from. novel ⇔ novelty > 70%.

What the metrics mean

TM-score (0–1): overall fold match — above 0.5 is the same fold, above 0.9 near-identical. Cα-RMSD (Å): average backbone distance after best-fit superposition — lower is better (under 2 Å is excellent). lDDT (0–1): local accuracy measured without superposition — above 0.8 is good. Each bar counts how many structures fall in that range.

Take-home: median TM-score 0.959 — most predictions match the experimental fold well, with a long tail that do not.

Read moreShow less — how each metric is calculated

TM-score: overall shape match, 0–1 (above 0.5 = same fold, above 0.9 near-identical), length-normalised. TM = (1/L) Σᵢ 1/(1 + (dᵢ/d₀)²) with dᵢ the aligned-Cα gap after superposition and d₀ = 1.24(L−15)^⅓ − 1.8. Ref: Zhang & Skolnick, Proteins 2004 doi:10.1002/prot.20264.

Cα-RMSD: the average straight-line distance between matching backbone Cα atoms once the two structures are best-fit superposed (Å; lower is better, under ~2 Å excellent). RMSD = √( (1/N) Σᵢ |Pᵢ − (R·Qᵢ + t)|² ), with Pᵢ/Qᵢ the experimental/model Cα coordinates and R,t the rotation and translation from Kabsch superposition.

lDDT: local accuracy with no superposition — the fraction of short-range inter-residue distances the model reproduces, so it is not fooled by a single wrongly-placed domain. lDDT = (1/N) Σᵢ ¼ Σ_t 1[ |d_exp − d_model| < t ] over thresholds t ∈ {0.5, 1, 2, 4} Å and all residue pairs within 15 Å.

Trend over time

The blue line is the mean TM-score of the structures by their deposit month; the red bars count how many were confidently wrong. Binning by deposit date (rather than by when we processed them) gives an even timeline, tracking whether AlphaFold's accuracy on newly-deposited structures is holding steady, improving, or slipping as the PDB keeps growing. Months with fewer than 5 structures are omitted so each point is a meaningful average. A dashed trend line is drawn only if the change over time is statistically significant.

Read moreShow less — how each metric is calculated

Mean TM-score: the month's average shape-match score. TM̄ = (1/M) Σ TM over the M structures deposited that month.

Trend line: a monotonic-trend test over the monthly means — Mann-Kendall (Kendall's τ) for significance, with a robust Theil-Sen slope for the line. Rank-based, so it tolerates the skewed TM distribution and noisy low-count months. Shown only when p < 0.05; otherwise a note reports that no significant trend was found.

Confidently wrong: the count that were both confident and wrong. count( mean pLDDT > 70 AND TM < 0.5 ).

Matched structures

PDBUniProtProteinMethodÅDeposited Novelty %pLDDTTMlDDTGDT_TSRMSDFRAUDFlag
6SDZ_A P02766 Transthyretin EM 2.97 2019-07-29 0.00 98.01 0.28 0.48 0.27 22.45 0.95 wrong
6SOF_A P06213 Insulin receptor EM 4.30 2019-08-29 0.20 84.14 0.55 0.73 2.57 19.16 0.69 ok
6Q0W_E Q9BW61 DET1- and DDB1-associated protein 1 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 30.00 74.85 0.29 0.74 3.23 17.67 0.63 wrong
6Q0V_E Q9BW61 DET1- and DDB1-associated protein 1 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 30.00 74.85 0.29 0.75 2.82 17.59 0.62 wrong
6Q0R_E Q9BW61 DET1- and DDB1-associated protein 1 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 30.00 76.65 0.31 0.79 3.57 15.63 0.62 wrong
6JFL_A O95140 Mitofusin-2,cDNA FLJ57997, highly similar X-ray 2.81 2019-02-10 32.50 90.27 0.97 0.79 3.75 28.01 0.58 ok
6JFM_A O95140 Mitofusin-2,Mitofusin-2 X-ray 2.09 2019-02-10 32.50 90.22 0.96 0.79 6.15 26.92 0.55 ok
6JFK_A O95140 Mitofusin-2,cDNA FLJ57997, highly similar X-ray 2.00 2019-02-10 32.50 89.92 0.98 0.85 4.79 27.42 0.55 ok
6N2E_A Q96QU1 Protocadherin-15 X-ray 2.90 2018-11-12 3.50 76.35 0.56 0.85 8.45 13.13 0.54 ok
6SOF_B P06213 Insulin receptor EM 4.30 2019-08-29 0.00 87.86 0.61 0.60 37.04 9.26 0.30 ok
6U3V_B P53621 Coatomer subunit alpha X-ray 2.96 2019-08-22 12.10 85.32 0.95 0.95 37.27 14.58 0.24 ok
6UGT_B Q6P5S8 PF06438179 Fab Light Chain X-ray 2.15 2019-09-26 0.00 95.77 0.76 0.94 48.12 3.68 0.21 ok
6UGV_B Q6P5S8 Infliximab Fab Light Chain X-ray 2.40 2019-09-26 0.00 95.77 0.76 0.94 48.59 3.62 0.21 ok
6TZT_B P53621 Coatomer subunit alpha X-ray 3.06 2019-08-13 3.70 85.66 0.96 0.95 44.09 13.80 0.20 ok
6UGS_A A8K008 Infliximab (Remicade) Fab Heavy Chain X-ray 1.95 2019-09-26 0.00 89.21 0.74 0.93 46.30 3.84 0.20 ok
6TYH_B P01308 Insulin B chain X-ray 1.60 2019-08-08 3.40 48.80 0.52 0.45 25.89 7.41 0.20 ok
6UGU_A A8K008 PF06438179 Fab Heavy Chain X-ray 2.20 2019-09-26 0.00 89.21 0.75 0.93 47.11 3.75 0.20 ok
6SOF_F P01308 Insulin EM 4.30 2019-08-29 0.00 48.25 0.32 0.55 35.00 5.11 0.15 ok
6UGW_A P0DOX5 PF-06438179/GP1111 Fc X-ray 2.00 2019-09-26 0.00 95.88 0.86 0.97 65.10 2.41 0.13 ok
6TYH_A P01308 Insulin A chain X-ray 1.60 2019-08-08 0.00 51.25 0.26 0.54 46.43 4.68 0.13 ok
6UGY_A P0DOX5 Remicade Fc X-ray 2.10 2019-09-26 0.00 95.94 0.86 0.97 66.63 2.34 0.13 ok
6UUI_C P04264 Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 1 X-ray 2.07 2019-10-30 63.06 0.81 0.12 ok
6IR0_A Q86UW9 Probable E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DTX2 NMR 2018-11-09 12.00 93.05 0.77 0.70 72.37 2.57 0.12 ok
6UGT_A A8K008 PF06438179 Fab Heavy Chain X-ray 2.15 2019-09-26 0.00 88.83 0.87 0.91 68.23 2.44 0.12 ok
6UGV_A A8K008 Infliximab Fab Heavy Chain X-ray 2.40 2019-09-26 0.00 88.73 0.88 0.91 67.81 2.40 0.12 ok
6SOF_E P01308 Insulin EM 4.30 2019-08-29 0.00 51.25 0.25 0.53 53.57 3.94 0.11 ok
6UGX_A P0DOX5 PF-06438179/GP1111 Fc X-ray 2.10 2019-09-26 0.00 95.88 0.90 0.98 73.55 1.88 0.11 ok
6MP4_A P07148 Fatty acid-binding protein, liver X-ray 2.50 2018-10-05 95.12 0.90 0.10 ok
6RYA_B P0CG48 Polyubiquitin-C X-ray 2.21 2019-06-10 0.00 89.83 0.91 0.89 79.28 2.34 0.08 ok
6UUI_X P13645 Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 10 X-ray 2.07 2019-10-30 64.31 0.88 0.08 ok
6T29_AAA Q8IU85 Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinas X-ray 1.48 2019-10-08 0.00 90.35 0.94 0.94 82.03 1.60 0.08 ok
6T28_AAA Q8IU85 Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinas X-ray 1.55 2019-10-08 0.00 90.40 0.94 0.94 81.64 1.59 0.08 ok
6UGS_B Q6P5S8 Infliximab (Remicade) Fab Light Chain X-ray 1.95 2019-09-26 0.00 95.59 0.95 0.95 82.24 1.36 0.08 ok
6N1G_A O14520 Aquaporin-7 X-ray 4.00 2018-11-08 66.30 97.57 0.95 0.84 88.45 1.94 0.07 ok
6O9B_A P04439 HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A- X-ray 2.20 2019-03-13 0.00 96.40 0.96 0.97 82.91 1.37 0.07 ok
6UGU_B Q6P5S8 PF06438179 Fab Light Chain X-ray 2.20 2019-09-26 0.00 95.59 0.95 0.95 84.46 1.28 0.07 ok
6O9C_A P04439 HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, A- X-ray 2.45 2019-03-13 0.00 96.22 0.97 0.97 89.43 1.37 0.06 ok
6Q0R_A Q16531 DNA damage-binding protein 1 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 1.80 93.62 0.98 0.94 90.36 1.30 0.06 ok
6O6W_A Q969H8 Myeloid-derived growth factor NMR 2019-03-07 100.00 novel 93.78 0.94 0.88 88.78 1.39 0.06 ok
6Q0V_A Q16531 DNA damage-binding protein 1 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 1.80 93.85 0.99 0.95 91.58 1.12 0.06 ok
6Q0W_A Q16531 DNA damage-binding protein 1 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 1.80 93.63 0.99 0.95 91.74 1.12 0.05 ok
6U3V_A O14579 Coatomer subunit epsilon X-ray 2.96 2019-08-22 9.50 92.19 0.97 0.95 91.95 1.22 0.05 ok
6TZT_A O14579 Coatomer subunit epsilon X-ray 3.06 2019-08-13 9.50 92.19 0.97 0.95 91.61 1.23 0.05 ok
6U7E_A P15144 Aminopeptidase N X-ray 3.00 2019-09-02 0.00 95.44 0.99 0.95 92.83 0.97 0.05 ok
6U7F_A P15144 Aminopeptidase N X-ray 2.75 2019-09-02 0.00 95.58 0.99 0.96 92.81 0.92 0.05 ok
6U7G_A P15144 Aminopeptidase N X-ray 2.35 2019-09-02 0.00 95.55 0.99 0.96 92.93 0.92 0.05 ok
6UEJ_A Q7Z2W4 Zinc finger CCCH-type antiviral protein 1 X-ray 2.21 2019-09-21 17.60 89.97 0.97 0.92 92.81 1.07 0.05 ok
6UE6_A O96028 Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase NSD2 X-ray 2.40 2019-09-20 0.00 85.76 0.95 0.90 92.23 1.42 0.04 ok
6UEI_A Q7Z2W4 Zinc finger CCCH-type antiviral protein 1 X-ray 2.51 2019-09-21 17.60 90.03 0.97 0.93 93.48 1.02 0.04 ok
6Q0R_D Q14498 RNA-binding protein 39 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 12.30 85.69 0.94 0.93 92.38 1.11 0.04 ok
6Q0W_D Q14498 RNA-binding protein 39 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 12.30 86.95 0.95 0.93 95.89 0.90 0.04 ok
6DBC_A P25440 Bromodomain-containing protein 2 X-ray 1.05 2018-05-03 64.06 0.94 0.04 ok
6DDJ_A P25440 Bromodomain-containing protein 2 X-ray 1.05 2018-05-10 64.06 0.94 0.04 ok
6MV7_A Q93091 Ribonuclease K6 X-ray 2.59 2018-10-24 90.50 0.96 0.04 ok
6Q0W_C Q66K64 DDB1- and CUL4-associated factor 15 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 35.00 91.88 0.97 0.93 94.79 1.17 0.04 ok
6Q0V_D Q14498 RNA-binding protein 39 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 12.30 86.95 0.95 0.94 96.84 0.85 0.04 ok
6Q0V_C Q66K64 DDB1- and CUL4-associated factor 15 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 35.00 91.88 0.97 0.93 94.66 1.16 0.03 ok
6Q0R_B Q66K64 DDB1- and CUL4-associated factor 15 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 14.30 92.44 0.99 0.96 96.63 1.11 0.03 ok
6Q0M_A Q96RT1 Erbin X-ray 1.20 2019-08-02 6.50 86.71 0.97 0.95 97.85 0.64 0.03 ok
6Q0W_B Q66K64 DDB1- and CUL4-associated factor 15 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 14.30 92.35 0.99 0.96 97.60 0.74 0.03 ok
6N0D_A Q9NUW8 Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 X-ray 1.45 2018-11-07 0.00 95.59 0.99 0.97 97.71 0.82 0.03 ok
6Q2T_A Q16850 Lanosterol 14-alpha demethylase X-ray 2.80 2019-08-08 0.00 95.14 0.99 0.98 97.81 0.57 0.03 ok
6N0O_A Q9NUW8 Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 X-ray 1.94 2018-11-07 0.00 95.42 0.99 0.97 97.60 0.65 0.03 ok
6Q0U_A Q96RT1 Erbin X-ray 1.89 2019-08-02 3.30 86.71 0.98 0.96 98.92 0.56 0.03 ok
6OC1_A Q02127 Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (quinone), mi X-ray 2.70 2019-03-21 0.60 97.74 0.99 0.97 98.69 0.87 0.03 ok
6N0R_A Q9NUW8 Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 X-ray 1.54 2018-11-07 0.00 95.42 0.99 0.96 97.37 0.64 0.03 ok
6PJV_A Q15465 Sonic hedgehog protein X-ray 1.43 2019-06-28 0.00 94.11 0.99 0.97 98.36 0.57 0.03 ok
6Q0V_B Q66K64 DDB1- and CUL4-associated factor 15 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 14.30 92.35 0.99 0.96 97.72 0.71 0.03 ok
6Q0R_C Q66K64 DDB1- and CUL4-associated factor 15 X-ray 2.90 2019-08-02 35.00 92.76 0.99 0.96 97.40 0.63 0.03 ok
6O9B_B P61769 Beta-2-microglobulin X-ray 2.20 2019-03-13 0.00 96.48 0.98 0.98 97.77 0.62 0.03 ok
6RPS_A O43570 Carbonic anhydrase 12 X-ray 2.79 2019-05-14 0.00 97.66 0.99 0.98 98.95 0.66 0.03 ok
6N0N_A Q9NUW8 Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 X-ray 1.48 2018-11-07 0.00 95.52 0.99 0.97 98.11 0.57 0.03 ok
6Q0N_A Q96RT1 Erbin X-ray 1.18 2019-08-02 0.00 86.71 0.98 0.96 98.66 0.53 0.03 ok
6KG2_A P13995 Bifunctional methylenetetrahydrofolate deh X-ray 2.25 2019-07-10 0.00 97.50 1.00 0.99 99.49 0.44 0.03 ok
6OC0_A Q02127 Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (quinone), mi X-ray 1.40 2019-03-21 0.60 97.70 0.99 0.98 98.63 1.05 0.02 ok
6O9C_B P61769 Beta-2-microglobulin X-ray 2.45 2019-03-13 0.00 96.78 0.99 0.98 99.00 0.51 0.02 ok
6MV6_A Q93091 Ribonuclease K6 X-ray 1.50 2018-10-24 90.50 0.98 0.02 ok
6DB0_A P25440 Bromodomain-containing protein 2 X-ray 1.70 2018-05-02 64.06 0.98 0.01 ok
6DDI_A P25440 Bromodomain-containing protein 2 X-ray 1.50 2018-05-10 64.06 0.99 0.01 ok

Click a column header to sort. FRAUD = confidence-weighted error; a structure is flagged confidently wrong when mean pLDDT > 70 yet TM-score < 0.5.