Live Stats, next update: Wed 02 Sep
Human PDBs Analysed
Confidently Wrong
Novel + Confidently Wrong
DB size
Visitors
Full statistics →
New PDB Depositions vs. Their Blind AlphaFold Predictions — A Running Test of “Is Folding Solved?”

Release week 2019-02-13

46
structures analysed (10 full · 21.7%)
00.0%
confidently wrong
00.0%
novel sequences
00.0%
novel & wrong
0.98
median TM-score

Zoomed into the red "confidently wrong" box above (pLDDT ≥ 70, TM < 0.5) — the structures AlphaFold got confidently wrong.

How to read this

Every point is one experimental protein structure. The horizontal axis is AlphaFold's own confidence in its prediction (mean pLDDT, 0–100). The vertical axis is how well that blind prediction actually matches the experiment (TM-score, 0–1; above 0.5 means the same fold, above 0.9 near-identical). Marker size grows with the FRAUD score (confidence-weighted error).

Cutoff: the shaded red box is the "confidently wrong" zone — AlphaFold was confident (mean pLDDT above 70) yet the fold is wrong (TM-score below 0.5). A predictor that had truly solved folding would leave that box empty.

Take-home: 0 of 46 structures (0.0%) are confidently wrong; median TM-score is 0.98.

Read moreShow less — how each metric is calculated

TM-score: how similar the two 3D shapes are overall, 0–1 (a random pair scores ~0.17, an identical fold ~1). Length-normalised so large and small proteins compare fairly. TM = (1/L) Σᵢ 1/(1 + (dᵢ/d₀)²) — dᵢ is the gap between the i-th aligned Cα atoms after best-fit superposition, and d₀ = 1.24(L−15)^⅓ − 1.8 sets the distance scale for length L. Ref: Zhang & Skolnick, Proteins 2004 doi:10.1002/prot.20264; computed with TM-align, doi:10.1093/nar/gki524.

pLDDT: AlphaFold's own confidence in each residue, 0–100 (higher = surer). It is the model predicting its own accuracy before ever seeing the experiment. We plot the per-structure mean. pLDDT = (1/N) Σᵢ pLDDTᵢ, where pLDDTᵢ is the network's confidence output for residue i.

FRAUD score: the headline number — how wrong the prediction was, weighted by how confident AlphaFold was, so a big error it was sure about counts most. FRAUD = (1/N) Σᵢ (pLDDTᵢ/100) · min(Δᵢ,15)/15, where Δᵢ is residue i's Cα distance from the experiment (Å) after superposition, capped at 15 Å. Runs 0 (perfect) to 1.

Novelty: how little AlphaFold had to go on — 100 minus the highest sequence identity between this protein and any structure released before the 2018-04-30 training cutoff. High = genuinely unseen (100% = nothing similar was ever in the training set). novelty = 100 − maxₚ identity(s, p) over pre-cutoff PDB chains p, with identity = 100 × (matching aligned residues)/(alignment length), from an MMseqs2 search.

Homology: the point colour. High novelty (above 70%) flags the sequence as novel (amber) — AlphaFold had no close template; otherwise a pre-cutoff homolog existed (blue) it could have learned the fold from. novel ⇔ novelty > 70%.

What the metrics mean

TM-score (0–1): overall fold match — above 0.5 is the same fold, above 0.9 near-identical. Cα-RMSD (Å): average backbone distance after best-fit superposition — lower is better (under 2 Å is excellent). lDDT (0–1): local accuracy measured without superposition — above 0.8 is good. Each bar counts how many structures fall in that range.

Take-home: median TM-score 0.98 — most predictions match the experimental fold well, with a long tail that do not.

Read moreShow less — how each metric is calculated

TM-score: overall shape match, 0–1 (above 0.5 = same fold, above 0.9 near-identical), length-normalised. TM = (1/L) Σᵢ 1/(1 + (dᵢ/d₀)²) with dᵢ the aligned-Cα gap after superposition and d₀ = 1.24(L−15)^⅓ − 1.8. Ref: Zhang & Skolnick, Proteins 2004 doi:10.1002/prot.20264.

Cα-RMSD: the average straight-line distance between matching backbone Cα atoms once the two structures are best-fit superposed (Å; lower is better, under ~2 Å excellent). RMSD = √( (1/N) Σᵢ |Pᵢ − (R·Qᵢ + t)|² ), with Pᵢ/Qᵢ the experimental/model Cα coordinates and R,t the rotation and translation from Kabsch superposition.

lDDT: local accuracy with no superposition — the fraction of short-range inter-residue distances the model reproduces, so it is not fooled by a single wrongly-placed domain. lDDT = (1/N) Σᵢ ¼ Σ_t 1[ |d_exp − d_model| < t ] over thresholds t ∈ {0.5, 1, 2, 4} Å and all residue pairs within 15 Å.

Trend over time

The blue line is the mean TM-score of the structures by their deposit month; the red bars count how many were confidently wrong. Binning by deposit date (rather than by when we processed them) gives an even timeline, tracking whether AlphaFold's accuracy on newly-deposited structures is holding steady, improving, or slipping as the PDB keeps growing. Months with fewer than 5 structures are omitted so each point is a meaningful average. A dashed trend line is drawn only if the change over time is statistically significant.

Read moreShow less — how each metric is calculated

Mean TM-score: the month's average shape-match score. TM̄ = (1/M) Σ TM over the M structures deposited that month.

Trend line: a monotonic-trend test over the monthly means — Mann-Kendall (Kendall's τ) for significance, with a robust Theil-Sen slope for the line. Rank-based, so it tolerates the skewed TM distribution and noisy low-count months. Shown only when p < 0.05; otherwise a note reports that no significant trend was found.

Confidently wrong: the count that were both confident and wrong. count( mean pLDDT > 70 AND TM < 0.5 ).

Matched structures

PDBUniProtProteinMethodÅDeposited Novelty %pLDDTTMlDDTGDT_TSRMSDFRAUDFlag
6A6I_A Q59FF6 Excision repair cross-complementing rodent X-ray 2.60 2018-06-28 58.69 0.72 0.16 ok
6DGF_B P0CG47 Polyubiquitin-B X-ray 2.34 2018-05-17 93.44 0.91 0.09 ok
6IQG_A P0DOX5 Immunoglobulin gamma-1 heavy chain X-ray 3.00 2018-11-08 0.00 95.88 0.94 0.96 81.04 1.42 0.08 ok
6IQH_A P0DOX5 Immunoglobulin gamma-1 heavy chain X-ray 3.00 2018-11-08 0.00 95.88 0.94 0.96 81.52 1.42 0.08 ok
6NQM_A O60341 Lysine-specific histone demethylase 1A X-ray 2.90 2019-01-21 0.00 97.49 0.98 0.98 83.77 1.44 0.08 ok
6NQU_A O60341 Lysine-specific histone demethylase 1A X-ray 2.70 2019-01-21 0.00 97.49 0.98 0.98 83.88 1.40 0.08 ok
6EGF_B Q9NWZ3 Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 X-ray 2.61 2018-08-19 83.94 0.92 0.07 ok
6H4A_A Q9UDY8 Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma X-ray 2.65 2018-07-20 79.44 0.93 0.06 ok
6E5L_A P09455 Retinol-binding protein 1 X-ray 1.17 2018-07-20 96.75 0.94 0.06 ok
6NN6_K Q8TEK3 Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase, H3 lys EM 3.90 2019-01-14 0.00 89.87 0.97 0.87 90.62 1.41 0.06 ok
6NN6_L F5H388 Ubiquitin EM 3.90 2019-01-14 1.30 94.83 0.93 0.86 94.93 0.85 0.05 ok
6A6I_F P0CG47 Polyubiquitin-B X-ray 2.60 2018-06-28 93.44 0.95 0.05 ok
6E5T_A P09455 Retinol-binding protein 1 X-ray 1.55 2018-07-23 96.75 0.95 0.05 ok
6A6I_B P0CG47 Polyubiquitin-B X-ray 2.60 2018-06-28 93.44 0.95 0.04 ok
6E6M_A P09455 Retinol-binding protein 1 X-ray 1.55 2018-07-25 96.75 0.96 0.04 ok
6NBD_B P68871 Hemoglobin subunit beta EM 3.20 2018-12-06 0.00 97.54 0.98 0.96 98.25 0.61 0.03 ok
6NM4_A Q9NQV7 Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase PRDM9 X-ray 2.58 2019-01-10 0.00 89.52 0.98 0.96 97.16 0.69 0.03 ok
6E6K_A Q96R05 Retinoid-binding protein 7 X-ray 1.30 2018-07-25 96.19 0.97 0.03 ok
6J67_A Q15554 Telomeric repeat-binding factor 2 X-ray 2.05 2019-01-14 0.00 93.39 0.99 0.97 97.66 0.66 0.03 ok
6NBD_A P69905 Hemoglobin subunit alpha EM 3.20 2018-12-06 0.00 98.34 0.99 0.98 99.11 0.48 0.03 ok
6MTM_B P61769 Beta-2-microglobulin X-ray 3.00 2018-10-19 94.06 0.98 0.02 ok
6MT3_C P61769 Beta-2-microglobulin X-ray 1.21 2018-10-19 94.06 0.98 0.02 ok
6MT5_B P61769 Beta-2-microglobulin X-ray 1.55 2018-10-19 94.06 0.98 0.02 ok
6MT4_B P61769 Beta-2-microglobulin X-ray 1.55 2018-10-19 94.06 0.98 0.02 ok
6MTL_B P61769 Beta-2-microglobulin X-ray 1.35 2018-10-19 94.06 0.98 0.02 ok
6MT6_C P61769 Beta-2-microglobulin X-ray 1.31 2018-10-19 94.06 0.98 0.02 ok
6MTM_A P01889 HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B- X-ray 3.00 2018-10-19 88.06 0.98 0.02 ok
6DGF_A O75604 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 2 X-ray 2.34 2018-05-17 68.12 0.97 0.02 ok
6I8S_A P05121 Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 X-ray 2.90 2018-11-21 88.88 0.98 0.02 ok
6E5W_A P82980 Retinol-binding protein 5 X-ray 2.50 2018-07-23 96.75 0.98 0.01 ok
6A5Q_A P31946 14-3-3 protein beta/alpha X-ray 2.00 2018-06-25 93.44 0.98 0.01 ok
6MTL_A P01889 MHC class I antigen X-ray 1.35 2018-10-19 88.06 0.98 0.01 ok
6A5S_A P61981 14-3-3 protein gamma X-ray 2.10 2018-06-25 94.19 0.99 0.01 ok
6EGE_A Q9NWZ3 Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 X-ray 1.40 2018-08-19 83.94 0.99 0.01 ok
6EGD_A Q9NWZ3 Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 X-ray 2.10 2018-08-19 83.94 0.99 0.01 ok
6MD7_A Q06124 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor X-ray 1.96 2018-09-04 85.94 0.99 0.01 ok
6MDC_A Q06124 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor X-ray 2.14 2018-09-04 85.94 0.99 0.01 ok
6MT3_A P01889 HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B- X-ray 1.21 2018-10-19 88.06 0.99 0.00 ok
6MDD_A Q06124 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor X-ray 2.05 2018-09-04 85.94 1.00 0.00 ok
6MD9_A Q06124 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor X-ray 2.12 2018-09-04 85.94 1.00 0.00 ok
6MDA_A Q06124 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor X-ray 2.21 2018-09-04 85.94 1.00 0.00 ok
6MDB_A Q06124 Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor X-ray 2.34 2018-09-04 85.94 1.00 0.00 ok
6MT5_A P01889 HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B- X-ray 1.55 2018-10-19 88.06 1.00 0.00 ok
6MT6_A P01889 HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B- X-ray 1.31 2018-10-19 88.06 1.00 0.00 ok
6MT4_A P01889 HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B- X-ray 1.55 2018-10-19 88.06 1.00 0.00 ok
6MXO_A Q9Y253 DNA polymerase eta X-ray 2.04 2018-10-31 76.88 1.00 0.00 ok

Click a column header to sort. FRAUD = confidence-weighted error; a structure is flagged confidently wrong when mean pLDDT > 70 yet TM-score < 0.5.